Compensating a departing director or employee
A dispute in the boardroom has resulted in one of the directors resigning from the firm. A financial settlement has been agreed to prevent the departure becoming acrimonious. Can the company apply the £30,000 exemption to the payment?
What’s the payment for?
The tax tribunal recently issued a ruling in the case of a senior employee who was paid a substantial sum following the termination of her employment. The tax position was tricky because the taxpayer argued that the money she received was for personal damages that would have made it entirely tax and NI free. Even in more mundane circumstances, deciding on the tax and NI position for termination payments is often challenging for employers.
Is it taxable?
Payments made in connection with the termination of employment (including directorships) are taxable. In some circumstances they are taxable and liable to NI contributions in the same way as salary. In other circumstances special rules apply to make it taxable except for the first £30,000 which is exempt from tax and NI contributions. However, the exemption isn’t as straightforward as it might seem at first sight.
It’s up to you as an employer to apply a special formula to work out if and how much of a termination payment constitutes a payment in lieu of notice (PILON) and deduct tax and NI on that part as if it were salary. The £30,000 exemption might apply to the remainder.
Does the exemption apply?
Even after deducting the PILON the balance of a termination payment doesn’t automatically qualify for the exemption. It applies only if the payment is “for” the termination and not just “because” of it. For example, a lump sum paid to a director because their contract says they are entitled to one is payment because of the termination and not for it. Similarly, an entitlement to accrued sums, such as bonuses, even if they aren’t mentioned in a contract, are because of termination and not for it.
Non-exempt payments
Tax and NI payable can push up the cost to you as the employer because the director will negotiate harder for a larger sum to account for what they lose in tax.
As illustrated by the Tribunal case, HMRC often goes after employers who apply the £30,000 exemption. To avoid being hit with the tax and NI cost of losing the exemption it’s essential to show HMRC that you have taken reasonable care that it applied.
Keep a record of the HMRC guidance you followed in deciding whether the £30,000 exemption applies. That way, even if ultimately HMRC proves you took the wrong course of action, it’s likely to ask the former employee or director to pay the extra tax.
In correspondence with a departing employee or director it’s important to describe payments accurately. Saying that it relates to lost earnings or in recognition of past services indicates that the £30,000 exemption doesn’t apply. Refer to it as a payment in relation to the termination of employment.
Related Topics
-
Gift relief to be "modernised"
A restriction on gift holdover relief will be reformed in 2026. This will affect gifts of certain shares, so what's the full story?
-
Government rushes through NI cap on pension salary sacrifice
The government has already drafted legislation to impose a £2,000 limit on NI exempt pension contributions under salary sacrifice arrangements. What else do we know?
-
Sneaky change is a blow for side hustles
With most of the media focused on the headline-grabbing announcements from the Budget, a read of the published small print reveals another change coming in 2029. It’s bad news if you are an employee with a side hustle, but what’s going on?




This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.